How I turned old conversations into testable hypotheses about my writing, decisions, and way of working—and then into contracts for a personal AI harness.
Technology / career / artificial intelligence
Mentor dos Nerds
Felipe Abreu writes about applied AI, agents, automation, software architecture, and the human effects of increasingly capable systems.
Editorial archive
Recent reads
Your Company Doesn't Need to Figure Out Where to Put AI
Where to use AI in the company? A practical guide to finding bottlenecks and choosing between process, automation, AI assistance, agents, and human decision-making.
The best answer isn't the one that pleases me most
Why useful agents need to expose uncertainty, point out blind spots, and turn human criteria into a verifiable system.
AI Is Not Just a Content Generator for Your Social Media
AI can produce content, but its value goes beyond the feed: coordination, validation, automation, and governed decisions rooted in real bottlenecks.
If AI Is Going to Do the Work, Don't Fire the Person Who Knows When It Is Wrong
AI automates tasks; it does not absorb context by osmosis. Firing the expert too early can turn efficiency into error at scale.
I Turned My Blind Spots into Contracts for My AI Agents
How I use a revisable portrait of my patterns to build agents that add counterweights without diagnosing, deciding, or thinking for me.
If You Think AI Is Just a Chatbot, You Started with the Wrong Limit
AI can converse, execute, validate, organize evidence, and decide within policies. The useful limit starts with the problem, not the chat window.
A Hypothesis Does Not Become Fact Because AI Repeated It
How I use a Markdown and Git wiki to separate hypotheses, decisions, and syntheses before silent inferences start governing the system.
An AI expert since the day before yesterday
Pseudo-experts turn recent discovery into authority. The antidote is to look for artifacts, consequences, review, limits, and responsibility.
You Wrote It, Didn't Read It—and Then It Bit You: AI Doesn't Sign for You
Real cases show why reviewing AI-generated content isn't polish: it's authorship, accountability, and control before publishing or deciding.